Welcome toChinese Marketing Net
Add to Favorites | Chinese
Position:home>Legal Adviser>
Bilk Zhang to still do not say to already spent litigant effectiveness for a giv
From;    Author:Stand originally

Because default brushstroke project money, zhejiang company of some construction group by Mr Zhou, why does the gentleman tell a court. In lawsuit, this company says to had begged to the company without the person project money, at present litigant effectiveness for a given period of time already passed. Recently, district court is collected to make first instance adjudicate south, think, mr Zhou is inside effectiveness for a given period of time of 2 years of lawsuit for many times dun project money, sue did not spend litigant effectiveness for a given period of time, construction company should pay project money Yu Yuan and 354 thousand deposit 50 thousand yuan.

In October 2003, mr Zhou and this company are signed " agreement of construction of cubic meter of earth " , agree a project that is this company by Mr Zhou undertakes the construction such as excavation. Of the same age in November, mr Zhou and why does the gentleman establish cooperative management group, undertake construction jointly. Finishing in July 2004 hind, project money settle accounts is 1.09 million yuan, this company pays 737 thousand Yu Yuan hind, default Yu Yuan and 354 thousand cash pledge 50 thousand yuan. Mr Zhou, why gentleman for many times dun not if really, last year in October to forensic to lodge a complaint.

In front courtyard careful, this company puts forward, mr Zhou, after why gentleman construction ends, all the time not to him dun afore-mentioned project moneys, litigant effectiveness for a given period of time already passed. For this, mr Zhou offerred 3 pieces of 2006 ticket that promote to carry on to the Shanghai between 2007 and carry on to promote the ticket of consummate Hai Fengxian. Driver Mr Yuan that uses car also arrives front courtyard attest, confirm Mr Zhou heads for carry on to promote for many times to money of project of this company dun.

After the court is tried, think, the witness testimony that Mr Zhou provides and Mr Zhou place narrate a fact to agree basically, can maintain Mr Zhou to be in 2 years inside litigant effectiveness for a given period of time for many times dun project money, reason builds the exculpatory opinion of the company not to grant to adopt. Accordingly, the court makes afore-mentioned court decisions.



Previous:" died not to sell " speech writer first instance obtains compensate 27 thousand
Next:Olympic Games tort head case: CCTV net accuses fast thunder